There is extensive media coverage in North America and Europe about net neutrality. What is it, and how does it impact the average internet user? Here is a basic guide.
When the internet first came into public use, it was not overrun by nearly as much information as it has now come to include. As people post more memory-intensive items like high-resolution photos and videos, and as they seek to share really big files like movies and video games, there is ever more discussion about ‘tiered services.’ Basically, an individual user pays a monthly fee to the internet service provider, and the size of the fee determines how fast and how extensive their access to the internet will be. It may also refer to making a network able to prioritize the speed and type of information that is exchanged-for example, to prioritize internet-based telephone service over a music download when both are running on a limited network at a given time.
Proponents of network neutrality say that tiered systems will damage the democratic nature of the internet by making some information less available to the general public than to bigger organizations that can pay for better service. They have also argued that non-neutral systems are subject to having certain sites and applications completely blocked by cable and telecommunications businesses who feel threatened by the competition created by the website. One prominent example is the possibility that cable providers would block access to Netflix so that subscribers would have to use their cable channels and would not be able to get all their movies via streaming video via a Netflix subscription.
As of early 2011, internet providers in the U.S. are not allowed to block any sites, but they can charge more for fasteraccess. Critics maintain that these guidelines allow for a tiered system, and the regulatory battle is still playing out across the wired world.






